|
|||||||
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools |
| Sponsored Links | |||
Advertisement | |||
|
|
#12 (permalink) | |
|
Tom Cat
![]() Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 407
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#13 (permalink) | |
|
Jr. Cat
![]() Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Fife,Scotland
Posts: 38
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#14 (permalink) |
|
Tom Cat
![]() Join Date: Nov 2012
Posts: 518
|
Nope, I wouldn't do it. There is a limit to the veterinary care I would spend on my pets and after a certain age, I forbid to do surgery on them. I've seen too many old pets die in a cage because their owners were trying to prolong their life when they were obviously suffering. I think that's incredibly selfish
|
|
|
|
|
|
#16 (permalink) |
|
Senior Cat
![]() Join Date: Jan 2013
Posts: 713
|
I wouldn't go through with an invasive medical treatment for my cats unless there was a reasonable chance of recovery or a good quality of life resulting. I believe that a natural death or being painlessly put to sleep is more humane than prolonging a life that will only result in more suffering.
I wouldn't go through an invasive surgery for myself unless there was a chance of recovery and future quality of life, either, for the record - so it's not about devaluing my pets, it's about a belief that artificially prolonging physical life is not always a positive thing.
__________________
![]() The Boys: Maisie (seven years old, adopted 2007) and Zephyr (six years old, adopted 2006) |
|
|
|
|
|
#17 (permalink) |
|
Cool Cat
![]() Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Ontario
Posts: 925
|
I would not either. If any if my animals develop any fatal disease and there's no chance of them living long term I would put them down. I don't believe in selfishly prolonging their lives for a few extra months if they would not be themselves, not to mention the outrageous cost.
Sent from Petguide.com Free App |
|
|
|
| Sponsored Links | |
Advertisement | |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|