Most of the vets said good quality dry was best, and canned should be reserved only as a treat.
Wow... that's like saying the best food for humans is super-processed McDonald's, and that fresh veggies and home-cooked meat should be reserved as a treat only.
I've had all say that raw was bad for house cats, and not to do it.
What an interesting distinction, eh? Raw food is bad for house cats, but not bad for... non-house cats? What's the difference, exactly? Do outdoor cats have a different anatomy from indoor cats? Do their organs somehow process raw food differently? *confused*
I think vets are "against" raw food for a variety of reasons... it depends on the vet, and for some it's a mix of reasons, but here are a few:
1. They are misinformed. Just because someone is a vet doesn't mean they have the best information on cat nutrition. Some do, but not all. It's their job to fix a cat's ailments, not necessarily prevent them. Just like doctors aren't always the best source on human nutrition...
2. There is a conflict of interests. Some vets sell certain brands of food, dry and canned, so they have something to gain from you buying these foods. They sell Science Diet at my vet, so it's no wonder my vet is constantly recommending it even though it's pretty much one of the worst things I could be feeding my cat.
3. They underestimate their clients. Some vets actually do realize the benefits of a raw diet, but don't recommend it for fear that their clients won't be able to do it properly. Feeling an unbalanced home-made raw diet, from what I hear, can be even worse than just feeding dry kibble. If you're going to do it, it needs to be done properly, and many cat owners just aren't willing to put in the time and effort to be able to do it properly. So some vets will play to the lowest common denominator and not recommend raw at all, just in case.
So given all these points, I decided to take my vet's word with a grain of salt on this one. I looked up a lot of information on raw cat diets and it just made a lot more sense to me. I transitioned my cat very early on, only a couple of weeks after getting her (she was about 1.5 years old), but I noticed quite a positive difference:
1. She seemed to have more energy (though this could be attributed to her getting more used to her new home).
2. She started drinking less water (cats should get most of their water from their food, not from drinking water), and yet, peeing more (a sign that she is getting more liquid despite the fact that she hardly ever drinks water).
3. Her stool stopped stinking. I kid you not!!! When we first got her, her stool would stink up the whole bathroom, if not for the whole house. Now we can't even tell when she pooped until we clean her litter box and find it. I can't even smell it close to the litter box. There is also way less poop. If that's not enough reason to go raw, I don't know what is.
Here are a few things to note about my cat, which may or may not be due to her raw diet. I don't know because I didn't have her on non-raw long enough to know how she used to be, plus I've only had her for 4 months so who knows if any of these things will change...
1. In the 4 months I've had her, she only just puked up her first hairball today, and I think it may be due to a little accident we had with her flea meds yesterday (it dripped and she was licking it off

). Her hair is long-ish, and I don't brush it much since it doesn't mat and she doesn't like it (although I may start after this), so it's pretty amazing that she only puked her first hairball today.
2. She smells great, her fur is super soft, her breath doesn't stink.
I think I've given you enough lists for today. Seriously, do some more reading on raw and draw your own conclusions. I just couldn't help but share
