It is awesome of you to conduct such analysis!
But as a math & stat grad, I can't help to bringing some criticism. Hope you don't mind 
1. You need to state where you obtain the raw data (for example, did you get the number from the lable on the can, or did you call the manufaturer?) and how you perform the analysis (i.e., algorithm/formula of your calculation)
2. You need to justify why among all the results, you choose to present only these 5 criteria: PROTEIN, FAT, CARBS, PHOSPHOROUS, SODIUM. In other words, why these are the most important and why others are not.
3. What's your observation and conclusion from your analysis results? You know, data are pointless and the most valuable thing is what you can deduct from the data. Conclusions can be something like "Among all samples, Weruva Chicken and Gravy has the highest amount of protein and lowest fat, and, hence, is most suitable for cats that...".
4. The 4 brand in your analysis, i.e., EVO, Innova, Wellness & Weruva are all of the top brands and within the same (high) price range. Although it is very interesting to see some analysis, I'm afraid it doesn't help a lot to other cat owners. It can be seen in the data that aside from Weruva, which is an obvious outlier of the sample set, others are more or less the same. So I don't see any difference in feeding Wellness or EVO. It will be very helpful if you could bring other range of brands, like the mid-end Felidae & Chicken Soup for Cat Lover and the low-end Friskey & Fancy Feast, into your analysis as well.
I'm very grateful someone could take the time to do this. I just think it would be nice if your work can be further improved
Thank you!
1. You need to state where you obtain the raw data (for example, did you get the number from the lable on the can, or did you call the manufaturer?) and how you perform the analysis (i.e., algorithm/formula of your calculation)
2. You need to justify why among all the results, you choose to present only these 5 criteria: PROTEIN, FAT, CARBS, PHOSPHOROUS, SODIUM. In other words, why these are the most important and why others are not.
3. What's your observation and conclusion from your analysis results? You know, data are pointless and the most valuable thing is what you can deduct from the data. Conclusions can be something like "Among all samples, Weruva Chicken and Gravy has the highest amount of protein and lowest fat, and, hence, is most suitable for cats that...".
4. The 4 brand in your analysis, i.e., EVO, Innova, Wellness & Weruva are all of the top brands and within the same (high) price range. Although it is very interesting to see some analysis, I'm afraid it doesn't help a lot to other cat owners. It can be seen in the data that aside from Weruva, which is an obvious outlier of the sample set, others are more or less the same. So I don't see any difference in feeding Wellness or EVO. It will be very helpful if you could bring other range of brands, like the mid-end Felidae & Chicken Soup for Cat Lover and the low-end Friskey & Fancy Feast, into your analysis as well.
I'm very grateful someone could take the time to do this. I just think it would be nice if your work can be further improved