Cat Forum banner

Pregnant Cat Has Dark Brown Discharge...what is it?

47K views 37 replies 8 participants last post by  BamMcg  
#1 ·
I have a pregnant cat that has been having dark brown (red tinged) discharge since last Wednesday night. She is acting normal and eating, but I am wondering what this discharge is, and I'm slightly worried.

I took her to my vet last Thursday, and the vet did an x-ray and said there is one large kitten inside, and that she should have the kitten soon. The vet did not know what the discharge was, but when I called the vet a day or two later, she said that sometimes there is discharge the week prior to birth. She took a swab and examined it under a microscope for several minutes, but then said it was inconclusive.

If anyone has experience with something like this, or knows what it is, I would appreciate some advice.

thanks
 
#4 ·
Thanks guys. I'll bring her back to the vet. Like I said, she is acting healthy, but has the strange discharge.

Could the kitten be dead inside, or would the vet be able to tell if things inside were OK by doing an ultrasound? The vet said before that she could do a caesarean-section, but I would only want surgery as a last resort. The vet also said she could give her drugs to "make" the kitten come out.
 
#6 ·
Hello guys, and thank you for the advice.

Here is the bad news. Her discharge went away for a few days, but came back a couple days ago and it smells bad. I took her to the vet and asked for an ultrasound, but none of the vets at the clinic I went to knew how to use the ultrasound machine. They recommended spaying my cat and removing her uterus, but I do not want to do that at all. How serious is this infection? The cat is not acting very sick and there is not allot of discharge. The vet I went to is pushing for me to spay her, but I think that is their business, and I do not want her spayed. Is surgery needed for this, or antibiotics and maybe flushing? The vet is saying she could die if not spayed. If anyone has experience, please let me know.

I had my doctor friend do an ultrasound, but they couldn't tell anything, I guess because they are used to doing humans. If I can find a vet that knows how to use their ultrasound, will they be able to tell if the kitten(s) has/have been expelled or are still inside?
 
#7 ·
Dresden said:
Hello guys, and thank you for the advice.

Here is the bad news. Her discharge went away for a few days, but came back a couple days ago and it smells bad. I took her to the vet and asked for an ultrasound, but none of the vets at the clinic I went to knew how to use the ultrasound machine. They recommended spaying my cat and removing her uterus, but I do not want to do that at all. How serious is this infection? The cat is not acting very sick and there is not allot of discharge. The vet I went to is pushing for me to spay her, but I think that is their business, and I do not want her spayed. Is surgery needed for this, or antibiotics and maybe flushing? The vet is saying she could die if not spayed. If anyone has experience, please let me know.

I had my doctor friend do an ultrasound, but they couldn't tell anything, I guess because they are used to doing humans. If I can find a vet that knows how to use their ultrasound, will they be able to tell if the kitten(s) has/have been expelled or are still inside?
Worst case scenario, it's pyometra and that can kill a cat if left untreated. It almost killed my oldest female last summer. If it's an infection your cat, at the leats, needs antibiotics. I think you're primary concern right now should be to save your cat, even though it might mean losing the kittens. I do know of pregnant females that have been treated for pyometra and given birth to perfectly healthy litters thought. In these females the antibiotics have been given in doses high enough to keep the infection under control, but low enough not to cause any damage in the kittens. But, the females have all needed an ordinary treatment with antibiotics after the kittens have been born because the treatment they got during the pregnancy wasn't good enought to kill the infection off, just to hold it back.
 
#9 ·
The poor cat needs to be speyed. Pyometra is very quickly fatal without surgery, and its most likely that the kittens inside her are dead already, so she'll have to have surgery to remove them. Please do what's best for your cat and follow your vets advice; why don't you want her speyed after she's been through such an awful experience?
 
#10 ·
Dresden said:
Thanks Sol. What was the treatment that was applied to your cat with pyometra...did she need surgery, or just antibiotics? I'm giving her antibiotics currently; as of today.
My cat had to be spayed and given antibiotics. Only antibiotics wouldn't have worked for her. One can treat with antibiotics and hormones (prostaglandin). The hormone will however kill the kittens since the hormones are used in order to get the pus out of the uterues. The kittens will follow the pus out from the uterues. :( In your case, spaying and antibiotics would be a better choice than hormones and antibiotics. Hormones are, to my knowledge, only used on females that aren't pregnant.
 
#11 ·
Since she is so close to her due date, why not induce labor, hope for the best, and flush, then provide antibiotics? With the infection, if the kittens aren't already dead, they might be soon, it might be best for mom and babies as well. I know it's not the same, but with our prize winning show milk goat, she got an infection and we did just that with no side effects or reprecussions. I know that decisions like these are hard. I was about 12 when I had to decide whether or not to give a med that if this goat had eaten what we thought she had would save her life but also kill her fetuses. I chose not to medicate her and all was well. It is hard, I know. I would get multiple opinions by other vets if I were you.
 
#12 ·
Thanks for the advice guys. I have to decide on something today. I just got back from another vet that took x-rays. The x-rays show one kitten inside that the vet thinks is dead, and she wants to remove the uterus due to pyometra, and she says that she has never heard of Prostaglandins. They couldn't do an ultrasound either.

If the kitten is dead, I would like to try the hormone/non-surgery method before having an invasion. It is very difficult for me since these vets do not seem to really care or know what they are doing.
 
#13 ·
Dresden said:
Thanks for the advice guys. I have to decide on something today. I just got back from another vet that took x-rays. The x-rays show one kitten inside that the vet thinks is dead, and she wants to remove the uterus due to pyometra, and she says that she has never heard of Prostaglandins. They couldn't do an ultrasound either.

If the kitten is dead, I would like to try the hormone/non-surgery method before having an invasion. It is very difficult for me since these vets do not seem to really care or know what they are doing.
Few vets know of the hormone + antibiotic treatment. You canr ead about prostaglandins here: http://www.homebirth.org.uk/pe2.htm

The hormone induces labor and drives the pus out of the uterus, and of course also kittens. Hormones are usually only used if it's a closed pyometra (no discharge comes out) because the uterues might burst if the pus doesn't get out.

And do think about what Heather Sharada wrote, pyometra tends to come back if the cat is left intact. If it's a breeding queen and one choose not to spay it's recommended to breed her as soon as she gets into heat again.
 
#14 ·
If the kitten is dead, she needs surgery to remove it. She will not give birth to a dead foetus. A dead kitten could be what is causing the infection in the first place, and if it is rotting inside her it will make her VERY sick. Even if the kitten is alive, a caesarian will give it a chance of life. I don't see that this is a hard decision at all. Save your cat, or don't save your cat.
 
#16 ·
Why does the infection usually happen again after a first time? I just ask because I've never heard of this. We never had a problem with recurrence in these situations, at least on the farm but maybe house pets are different? Once, with a girl with a horrible infection, we had to clean her out with a hose once a day and she had absolutly no issues later after that, along with antibiotics etc. If the baby somehow died and then the infection happend, what makes you think that it will inevitably happen again? Then, if the infection happened, then the kitten died, why do you think that would happen again? Why does the vet think the kitten is dead? I think since the situation has escaladed, at least a c-section is in order like NOW. Is there no other vets willing to do an ultrasound to confirm the death of the kitten? If the vet I went to was uncaring and unknowledgable in a life or death situation like this, I would definatly find another vet ASAP for a second opinion. I'm not trying to be rude, I promise, or even try to turn this into a debate as I don't know exactly how sick the cat is, how elevated her white count is, etc. Just that if she has a nice breeding queen and there is some other way to fix this issue without endangering her further than needed, like bad odds of survival, and there is no reason to assume the infection can't be solved through any other meens, why spay her? Noone knows what the situation is exactly, and I know at least I am not a vet, though I do give shots, basic vet care, sub q fluids, and have assisted in hundreds of births, I even broke a finger once turning a breach when I miscalculated a contraction...ouch. She needs to find out all her options at a vet that cares and knows what they are talking about, am I right?
 
#17 ·
BamMcg said:
Why does the infection usually happen again after a first time? I just ask because I've never heard of this. We never had a problem with recurrence in these situations, at least on the farm but maybe house pets are different? Once, with a girl with a horrible infection, we had to clean her out with a hose once a day and she had absolutly no issues later after that, along with antibiotics etc. If the baby somehow died and then the infection happend, what makes you think that it will inevitably happen again? Then, if the infection happened, then the kitten died, why do you think that would happen again? Why does the vet think the kitten is dead? I think since the situation has escaladed, at least a c-section is in order like NOW. Is there no other vets willing to do an ultrasound to confirm the death of the kitten? If the vet I went to was uncaring and unknowledgable in a life or death situation like this, I would definatly find another vet ASAP for a second opinion. I'm not trying to be rude, I promise, or even try to turn this into a debate as I don't know exactly how sick the cat is, how elevated her white count is, etc. Just that if she has a nice breeding queen and there is some other way to fix this issue without endangering her further than needed, like bad odds of survival, and there is no reason to assume the infection can't be solved through any other meens, why spay her? Noone knows what the situation is exactly, and I know at least I am not a vet, though I do give shots, basic vet care, sub q fluids, and have assisted in hundreds of births, I even broke a finger once turning a breach when I miscalculated a contraction...ouch. She needs to find out all her options at a vet that cares and knows what they are talking about, am I right?
Pyometra is likely to come back. If the infection is due to a dead foetus there's no reason to believe the infection will cause problems later on. Why pyometra tend to reoccur I don't know, but it's well known that it often reoccurs especially if it's only treated with antibiotics. The combination Baytil + Prostaglandins have shown to be a quite successful treatment of pyometra BUT still you need to breed the female again as soon as possible in order tp prevent the pyo from coming back. Some think it might be a hereditary factor involved (especially when young females are involved). An active breeding queen is quite unlikely to get pyo since she rarely have long periods between her litters. If a female has many "empty heats" she's more likely to develop pyo, the same goes for females on birth control.
 
#18 ·
Aha. Then if that's the case, and her breeding queen is a nice female, she might want to number one, make sure of what caused the infection, like how long has the kitten been dead as oposed to how long the infections has been there, etc? It would also explain to me why our animals might not have had this problem, they got bred every heat. But they only go into heat once a year. See, I learn something new every day.
 
#21 ·
Maybe I'm not understanding this correctly -- I don't have experience with this so I'm trying to listen to what everyone says. If there is a very good chance that the pyometra could come back, and this is a very dangerous condition, why would you want to potentially put her through that again? Breed her again really quick and you reduce the risk that it will come back, right? Seems like that would be pretty crappy after having a horrible infection and a possible surgery. I am just trying to personify this cat, and I know that may be unreasonable. It's just me. :oops: And if it IS in fact a hereditary trait...wouldn't a reputable breeder want to keep that out of a breeding program?
 
#22 ·
That's the thing I do agree with you on. If it IS something that will return over again, of course, have her spayed, but this vet doesn't sound like he knows what's going on at all. She needs to find out what type of infection this is, if it's from the dead kitten, if the kitten is actually dead etc. What I can't figure out is why people on the internet are saying that she needs to spay the cat when they don't know what's going on either, even less than the vet in question. So how can someone in good faith say it's a specific illness without even seeing the cat and having so little information about the circumstances and saying for certain the cat needs to be spayed? Let her get the facts from a vet savy in her specific area and get all the bits and peices missing from the puzzle. To me a hunch from someone over the internet is just not enough, again if it were me, to just go out and get my breeding animal spayed. See a good vet, get all your options after you figure out what happened, then make the decision.
 
#24 ·
You can not give that type of advice over the internet. There are too many unknowns. The advice you can give is what your experiences are/were in similar situations as described by her, and to go to a better vet. How come nobody even mentions going to another vet? You guys haven't even seen this cat yet you are confident enough to tell her to spay the cat? That's what I'm getting at. Not that it isn't the right thing to spay her cat, just to make it an informed decision. It might be the right decision, but how do YOU know for sure? I would too like to know what happend with the poor cat...
 
#26 ·
I am sorry, really not trying to step on toes here. I probably have more experiences in births and birthing problems than most if not all on this thread. Here's the first couple of things that come to mind. The cat could've gone into labor and since the kitten was so big, gotten stuck haulting the labor, pinching the cord or already seperated afterbirth, killing the kitten and the labor never progressed. In this instance, the kitten could've also slipped back further into the uterus as well so even checking the birth canal or how seperate the hips have been wouldn't help pinpoint that. Another scenario, the kitten could've died in utero, then the infection started because of the dead kitten. She could've been slightly dialated and an infection could've "snuck" in that way, where as the kitten could still be alive if the infection hasn't killed it yet. The cat could've never gone into labor in the first place because there was only one kitten, sometimes that happens with an animal that usually produces more than one fetus, and then the kitten died and the infection started. There are so many possabilities to the start of the infection. A vet really needs to take a look, check the kitten for viability, and give the owner her options. We have NEVER had to spay an animal because of infection. We did have to spay a dog because of a phantom pregnancy where she ended up with mastitis that would'nt go away, put a goat down because of a torn uterus, we had a misscarriage on Christmas morning that was not so fun, of almost full term quads mind you, but never an infection so horendous the animal had to spayed. I have learned that almost every species' birth is just like another. However there are species that do fine birthing back feet first and some don't and a few other differences, minor differences. And don't get me wrong, we've had about 15 cats give birth on the farm and in the house, I'm just trying to say that I am not a novice either, I have so many birth experiences, but cats are way down there on the totum pole of my birthing experiences. I've always wanted to be a vet and have read and studied many books along with all my experiences and still have neighbors and old friends even from high school call me long distance to ask animal questions. However noone can know exactly for sure what is happening with this cat, therefor, all we can do is give our own personal experiences in relation to hers and hope for the best. We cannot diagnose anything on the internet, she just needs to find another vet. I'm really not trying to sound snobby, just wanted to reinforce my credibility. What I can do, if she hasn't done anything about the cat yet, though hopefully she has or the outcome looks pretty bad, is contact the vet I chat with via e-mail or home number and give her the info, but like I said, the cat needs tests and still, though she is a vet, the vet would be speculating on possibilities.