I was doing my work experience at the vets today when a conversation caught my interest. It was about a cat that had been brought in the night before while I was away, and the vets were talking about putting it down. 'yes, the owners told us last night that as they were getting a new grandchild and this cat has litter use issues they didn't want him anymore and are asking for him to be put down', 'yes, Poppy isn't it. It's a shame, she's so lively and friendly for her age, she's 16 you know'. I go into the kennels and what do I find, Poppy, this small, purring, affectionate, lovely cat, rubbing against the bars trying to get my attention, begging for a stroke.
I was almost in tears at this point. As none of the vets had the heart to put her down, they phoned the family and asked permission for them to rehome her instead. Eventually, the family agreed.
What I can't understand however is, a) why any family, after 16 years of owning such a loving and affectionate pet, would decide to have them put down rather than immediatley find her a new home and b) why vets are under obligation to put down healthy pets just because their owners do not want them? Anyone else find anything wrong with this? I mean, shouldn't there be a law saying that as long as there are no health issues, a cat should at least be attempted to be rehomed rather than killed first?
Sorry the the little rant but this almost brought me to tears today. This cat was lovely, so kind, so loving. I just can't believe how close she was to being put down for practically no reason - she was completely healthy. I just find it so unfair...
I was almost in tears at this point. As none of the vets had the heart to put her down, they phoned the family and asked permission for them to rehome her instead. Eventually, the family agreed.
What I can't understand however is, a) why any family, after 16 years of owning such a loving and affectionate pet, would decide to have them put down rather than immediatley find her a new home and b) why vets are under obligation to put down healthy pets just because their owners do not want them? Anyone else find anything wrong with this? I mean, shouldn't there be a law saying that as long as there are no health issues, a cat should at least be attempted to be rehomed rather than killed first?
Sorry the the little rant but this almost brought me to tears today. This cat was lovely, so kind, so loving. I just can't believe how close she was to being put down for practically no reason - she was completely healthy. I just find it so unfair...